 Hunian Syariah # The newest validity and you can accuracy of one’s survey was tested and you may corrected in line with the pre-attempt

The newest validity and you can accuracy of one’s survey was tested and you may corrected in line with the pre-attempt

Towards , this study selected a few classes from inside the Chengdu Shishi middle school and you can Jinniu secondary school respectively, delivered 3 hundred forms, recovered 278 forms, deducted 12 invalid forms and you will 266 valid questionnaires. The latest certified investigation are finished of .

Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) showed that the sports leisure attitude scale with 16 items was suitable for factor analysis (KMO = 0.87, Bartlett’s test for sphericity p < 0.001), and three common factors could be extracted, and the corresponding Cronbach' ? coefficients were 0.84, 0.81, and 0.83 respectively. In addition, the overall scale ? coefficient = 0.85; Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed that the fitness indexes AGFI, CFI, NFI, and IFI were 0.92, 0.95, 0.93, and 0.91, which were all greater than the standard of 0.90, RMSEA = 0.03 (less than 0.05, with good adaptation); In addition, the combined reliability of the three common factors (potential variables) is more than 0.79, which shows that the scale has good reliability and validity.

## Canonical relationship study is actually a mathematical strategy always attempt the new relationship studies ranging from one to set of control variables plus one category from standards variables

Exploratory factor analysis showed that the leisure motivation scale with 21 items was suitable for factor analysis (KMO = 0.78, Bartlett’s test for sphericity p < 0.001). The scale could extract 4 common factors, corresponding to Cronbach' ? coefficient is between 0.79–0.85, and the overall scale ? Coefficient = 0.88; Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fitness indexes AGFI, CFI, NFI, and IFI were 0.91, 0.92, 0.92, and 0.93, which were all greater than the standard of 0.90, RMSEA = 0.04 (less than 0.05, good adaptation); In addition, the combined reliability of the four dimensions (potential variables) is more than 0.81, which shows that the reliability and validity of this scale are good.

Exploratory factor analysis showed that the leisure barriers scale with 17 items was suitable for factor analysis (KMO = 0.85, Bartlett ball test p < 0.001). The scale could extract three common factors, corresponding to Cronbach' ? coefficient is between 0.82–0.86, and the overall scale ? Coefficient = 0.85; Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fitness indexes AGFI, CFI, NFI, and IFI were 0.94, 0.90, 0.91, and 0.93, which were all greater than the standard of 0.90, RMSEA = 0.02 (less than 0.05, good adaptation); In addition, the combined reliability of the three dimensions (potential variables) is more than 0.79, which shows that the reliability and validity of this scale are good.

Exploratory factor analysis showed that the leisure satisfaction scale with 25 items was suitable for factor analysis (KMO = 0.82, Bartlett’s test for sphericity p < 0.001). The scale could extract 6 common factors, corresponding to Cronbach' ? coefficient is between 0.81–0.86, and the overall scale ? Coefficient = 0.84; Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fitness indexes AGFI, CFI, NFI, and IFI were 0.91, 0.93, 0.95, and 0.92 in order, which was all greater than the standard of 0.90, RMSEA = 0.03 (less than 0.05, good adaptation); In addition, the combined reliability of the six dimensions (potential variables) is more than 0.81, which shows that the reliability and validity of this scale are good.

## Analytical Analytics

It will get the limit correlation involving the linear integration out-of manage parameters and also the linear combination of traditional parameters. Hence, canonical correlation study evaluation the latest canonical relationship combination of multiple traditional variables and you can numerous control variables, Canonical relationship research can create a combination of tall and you may unimportant canonical relationship. Fundamentally, it will supply the feabie hile pursuing the earliest recommendations: a person is the common correlation coefficient can be reflect the fresh relationship education amongst the linear combination of handle details therefore the linear combination out of important details. The typical correlation coefficient need certainly to arrived at a life threatening level so you’re able to portray the significant correlation between them sets of linear combos. The second is the judgment coefficient (we.elizabeth., this new rectangular worth of typical correlation coefficient Roentgen). This means the regular items of your own practical variable normally getting said because of the typical affairs of one’s handle adjustable (not less than 10%). The third ‘s the architectural coefficient (regular stream). It’s intended to handle the relationship involving the varying and you will the latest standard variable to their particular regular linear combos. The absolute property value the coefficient must be more 0.30 to spell it out you to their respective regular linear combos has actually explanatory fuel.